← Explore all cases
Conviction Divination and fortune-telling services Kovrov, Vladimir Oblast, Russia · 2020

Russia: an elderly woman told her savings had to be 'cleansed' of a curse, and handed back advertising leaflets

Request a correction or reply

Record class

Core record

Evidence status

Convicted

Authority role

a woman who approached a stranger outside a shop and told her a curse had been placed on her

Organization

Kovrov City Court, Vladimir Oblast (Ковровский городской суд Владимирской области)

Archive classification

This is the archive's application of its published inclusion test. The cited record appears below.

The authority is the defendant's claimed capacity to detect a porcha and to perform the rite removing it. The mechanism is distinctive: the rite was defined so that the victim's money was itself the object requiring treatment — it had to be 'cleansed' — which made surrendering her entire savings not a payment for the service but a constituent step of it. A victim who accepted the diagnosis had no coherent way to refuse the handover without abandoning the cure.

  • Curse or witchcraft threat
  • Spiritual healing or treatment

Evidence structure

Proceedings

  1. 2020-05-14 · conviction and sentence at first instance

    Kovrov City Court, Vladimir Oblast, Russia (Ковровский городской суд Владимирской области). The defendant, anonymised in the published judgment as ФИО1, was convicted of fraud causing significant damage to a citizen under ч.2 ст.159 of the Criminal Code. The court found she approached the victim, a stranger, outside a shop and told her a curse had been placed on her and that removing it required her money to be 'cleansed'; the victim collected 26,000 roubles from her home, withdrew a further 195,000 roubles from her account at a Sberbank branch, and met the defendant, who led her to an area among garages and took the 221,000 roubles, handing back advertising leaflets prepared in advance to imitate banknotes. She was sentenced to 10 months 15 days' deprivation of liberty in a colony-settlement, with time in custody counted at one day for two, and remained in custody pending the judgment taking effect. The judgment records voluntary compensation of the loss as a mitigating circumstance, along with support for two children without independent income and care for a father with a group 2 disability. The prosecutor withdrew from the charge the investigation's characterisation of the victim as defenceless and helpless by reason of advanced age, on the ground that the case file contained no evidence supporting it; the court nonetheless treated the victim's advanced age as raising the offence's degree of public danger when assessing sentence.

Documented coercion mechanisms

  • an unsolicited diagnosis delivered to a stranger in the street: the defendant told the victim «на ней «наложена порча»»
  • the removal rite defined so that it required the victim's money itself — the cash had to be «очистить» (cleansed), so all of it had to be handed over
  • the victim directed home and then to a bank branch to withdraw her savings, and finally to a location among garages away from view
  • advertising leaflets prepared in advance and substituted for the banknotes, so the loss was not apparent at the moment of handover

Cited record

Sources

court of record criminal judgment Приговор № 1-208/2020 от 14 мая 2020 г. по делу № 1-208/2020, Ковровский городской суд (Владимирская область) — Уголовное. Дело 33RS0011-01-2020-001845-10.

The full text of the criminal judgment, read directly from the Russian judgments database sudact.ru. The court records that the defendant, «обманывая последнюю, сообщила, что на ней «наложена порча» и для снятия порчи необходимо «очистить» денежные средства», and «убедила Потерпевший №1 предоставить ей для проведения необходимого обряда все имеющиеся у нее в наличии денежные средства». The victim took 26,000 roubles from home and «со своего лицевого счета сняла принадлежащие ей денежные средства в размере 195000 рублей», then followed the defendant «к гаражам», where the defendant «под предлогом снятия порчи, завладела и тем самым похитила путем обмана... денежные средства в размере 221000 рублей, передав последней взамен похищенных денежных купюр, приготовленные заранее рекламные буклеты, имитируя денежные средства». The judgment also records that «государственный обвинитель... исключил указанную формулировку из обвинения, поскольку материалы дела не содержат доказательств того», in respect of the allegation that the victim was defenceless and helpless by reason of age, while stating that the offence carried «повышенную степень общественной опасности с учетом престарелого возраста потерпевшей». The operative part imposes «лишения свободы на срок 10 месяцев 15 дней с отбыванием в колонии-поселении».

Source provenance

Source access and integrity log

This log records source retrieval and file integrity. It does not mean that an automated process independently confirmed every statement in the source.

Source and tier basis
https://sudact.ru/regular/doc/1gURwN3a6MVl/ Corpus classification: court-of-record; evidentiary role: criminal-judgment.
Retrieval
2026-07-29 · Preserved
Bound by Fear research cycle 2026-07-29 (Russian-language sweep; full judgment read via the browser pane; the conduct findings, the leaflet substitution, the withdrawal of the defenceless-and-helpless formulation by the prosecutor, the mitigating circumstances and the colony-settlement term taken verbatim from the judgment)

Named in this record? Request a correction, report a changed disposition, or submit a response.

Related record

Related cases · Divination and fortune-telling services

Browse all 80 Divination and fortune-telling services records