← Explore all cases
Conviction Divination and fortune-telling services Gudermes, Chechen Republic, Russia · 2019

Chechnya: two acquaintances told a curse lay on their savings, which had to be handed over for the rite

Request a correction or reply

Record class

Core record

Evidence status

Convicted

Authority role

a woman who offered to remove a curse by special rites, which the court found she knew she had no ability to perform

Organization

Gudermes City Court, Chechen Republic (Гудермесский городской суд Чеченской Республики)

Archive classification

This is the archive's application of its published inclusion test. The cited record appears below.

The authority is the claimed capacity to lift a curse by special rites, and the court's finding that the defendant knew she had no such capacity is stated expressly — «заведомо зная, что способностями такого рода не обладает». The mechanism is the one seen in the Kovrov judgment: the curse is located on the victim's money, so surrendering the whole of it is not a payment for a service but the service itself. Here the framing is tighter still, because the money was taken as a loan for the duration of the rite with a date for its return, which removed the moment at which a victim would ordinarily weigh a price against a benefit.

  • Curse or witchcraft threat
  • Prosperity, divination, or curse-removal claim

Evidence structure

Proceedings

  1. 2019-12-10 · conviction and sentence at first instance

    Gudermes City Court, Chechen Republic, Russia (Гудермесский городской суд Чеченской Республики). The defendant, anonymised in the published judgment as ФИО4 and elsewhere as ФИО6 З., was convicted on two counts of fraud causing significant damage to a citizen under ч.2 ст.159 of the Criminal Code. In each case the court found she learned in conversation at a grocery shop how much an acquaintance had saved, told her falsely that a curse lay on that money, and offered to remove it by special rites while knowing she possessed no such ability. The first victim, having invited her home for the purpose, handed over 50,000 roubles for the duration of the rite and to be returned by a stated date; the defendant left with it and, by the end of November 2017, had spent it on repaying debts to trading representatives and on personal needs. The second victim was approached in the same way in respect of 127,000 roubles. She received one year six months on each count, aggregated by partial addition under ч.2 ст.69 to two years' deprivation of liberty, suspended under ст.73 with an eighteen-month probationary period and an obligation to register monthly.

Documented coercion mechanisms

  • victims selected from conversation in a grocery shop after each mentioned the sum she had saved
  • the curse located on the money itself, so that the savings became the object requiring treatment rather than the price of it
  • the rite staged in the victim's own home, at her invitation, which the court records she extended in order that the curse be lifted
  • the money taken «на время проведения ритуала» — for the duration of the rite, with a stated date for its return

Cited record

Sources

court of record criminal judgment Приговор № 1-159/2019 от 10 декабря 2019 г. по делу № 1-159/2019, Гудермесский городской суд (Чеченская Республика) — Уголовное.

The full text of the criminal judgment, read directly from the Russian judgments database sudact.ru. The court records that the defendant, having learned in a grocery shop «о накопленных последней денежных средствах в сумме 50 000 рублей», «сообщила Потерпевший №2 заведомо ложные сведения о том, что на накопленные ею денежные средства в сумме 50 000 рублей, наложена порча и предложила последней с помощью проведения специальных ритуалов, заведомо зная, что способностями такого рода не обладает, снять наложенную порчу с принадлежащих ей указанных денежных средств». The victim «пригласила ФИО6 З. к себе домой... для того чтобы последняя с помощью проведения специальных ритуалов, сняла порчу», and in the kitchen the defendant «попросила Потерпевший №2 на время проведения ритуала по снятию порчи передать ей... денежные средства в сумме 50 000 рублей... сроком до ДД.ММ.ГГГГ, которые ФИО6 З. похитила путем обмана». The second count follows the same form in respect of a second acquaintance and 127,000 roubles. The operative part convicts on both counts under ч.2 ст.159, aggregates to two years under ч.2 ст.69 and suspends under ст.73.

Source provenance

Source access and integrity log

This log records source retrieval and file integrity. It does not mean that an automated process independently confirmed every statement in the source.

Source and tier basis
https://sudact.ru/regular/doc/gCsG5BljqEQR/ Corpus classification: court-of-record; evidentiary role: criminal-judgment.
Retrieval
2026-07-29 · Preserved
Bound by Fear research cycle 2026-07-29 (Russian-language sweep; full judgment read via the browser pane; both counts, the finding that the defendant knew she had no such ability, the loan framing of the handover, the sums and the suspended aggregate taken verbatim from the judgment)

Named in this record? Request a correction, report a changed disposition, or submit a response.

Related record

Related cases · Divination and fortune-telling services

Browse all 80 Divination and fortune-telling services records