← Explore all cases
Conviction Divination and fortune-telling services Proletarsky District, Tver, Tver Oblast, Russia · 2017

Russia: 'bring me holy water for the rite' — and while the householder fetched it, the bedroom was emptied

Request a correction or reply

Record class

Core record

Evidence status

Convicted

Authority role

a woman who told householders a curse lay on them and that she could remove it, using that claim to obtain entry to their homes

Organization

Proletarsky District Court of Tver (Пролетарский районный суд г. Твери)

Archive classification

This is the archive's application of its published inclusion test. The cited record appears below.

The authority is the claimed capacity to detect and remove a curse, and this judgment shows it performing two distinct services for the offender. It obtained entry: the court's finding is explicit that the approach was made to ease her getting into the house, and the victim invited her in only after accepting that a curse was upon her. Then it created the opening — the request for holy water sent the householder out of the room on an errand she had every reason to think was part of the treatment, and the judgment records that the moment the glass was handed over the defendant walked quickly to the bedroom. Neither step required force or stealth. The rite supplied a reason for the door to open and a reason for the owner to leave the room, and the borrowing of an Orthodox object gave the request a legitimacy a purely folk demand would have lacked.

  • Curse or witchcraft threat
  • Spiritual healing or treatment

Evidence structure

Proceedings

  1. 2017-09-14 · conviction and sentence at first instance

    Proletarsky District Court of Tver, Tver Oblast, Russia (Пролетарский районный суд г. Твери). The defendant, anonymised in the published judgment as ФИО1, was convicted on four counts: theft on a large scale with unlawful entry into a dwelling causing significant damage under п.«а,в» ч.3 ст.158 of the Criminal Code; two counts of fraud by deception and abuse of trust causing significant damage under ч.2 ст.159; and attempted theft with unlawful entry under ч.3 ст.30 and п.«а» ч.3 ст.158. On 19 January 2017 she approached a woman she did not know outside her home and, to ease her entry into the house, told her falsely that a curse lay upon her which she could remove; the victim believed her and invited her in. Between 14:00 and 15:00, having entered under that pretext, she asked the victim to bring her holy water for the removal, and on receiving the glass walked quickly into the bedroom and took jewellery valued at 273,000 roubles, a large scale under the note to art. 158. Immediately afterwards, in the same house, she formed a further intent and obtained property from the same victim by deception. The further recorded losses were 5,000 and 24,500 roubles against two other victims. The fourth count was an attempt which was not completed for reasons beyond her control. She received three years on the theft count, two years on each fraud count and two years six months on the attempt, aggregated by partial addition under ч.3 ст.69 to five years' deprivation of liberty in a general-regime correctional colony, with time in custody from 30 May 2017 credited. Compensation of 273,000, 5,000 and 24,500 roubles was awarded to the three victims.

Documented coercion mechanisms

  • the curse claim used specifically to secure an invitation indoors — the court found she approached the victim «для облегчения... проникновения в указанный дом»
  • holy water requested as a material the rite required, which sent the householder out of the room on an errand she had reason to believe was part of the treatment
  • the interval used to enter the bedroom: the judgment records that on receiving the glass she «быстрым шагом проследовала в комнату»
  • a second deception run on the same victim immediately after the theft, so the encounter continued as though nothing had happened
  • the same approach attempted at a fourth household, where it failed for reasons outside her control

Cited record

Sources

court of record criminal judgment Приговор № 1-164/2017 от 14 сентября 2017 г. по делу № 1-164/2017, Пролетарский районный суд г. Твери (Тверская область) — Уголовное.

The full text of the criminal judgment, read directly from the Russian judgments database sudact.ru. The court records that «для облегчения реализации своего умысла и проникновения в указанный дом ФИО1 подошла к ХХХ. и, сообщив последней ложную информацию, заверила ее об имеющейся на ней порче и возможности ее снятия. ХХХ. поверила ФИО1 и пригласила ее в дом». It continues that «под вымышленным предлогом снятия порчи, незаконно проникнув в дом, ФИО1 попросила у ХХХ принести ей святую воду якобы для снятия порчи», and that «получив от потерпевшей стакан со святой водой ФИО1 быстрым шагом проследовала в комнату ХХХ», taking jewellery «на общую сумму 273 000 рублей, что согласно примечанию к ст. 158 УК РФ является крупным размером». Further losses of «5000 рублей» and «24 500 рублей» are recorded against other victims, and the fourth count is an attempt which «не было доведено до конца по независящим от этого лица обстоятельствам». The operative part imposes three years, two years, two years and two years six months on the respective counts, aggregated under ст.69 ч.3 to «05 (пять) лет... с отбыванием наказания в исправительной колонии ОБЩЕГО режима», with compensation awarded to the three victims.

Source provenance

Source access and integrity log

This log records source retrieval and file integrity. It does not mean that an automated process independently confirmed every statement in the source.

Source and tier basis
https://sudact.ru/regular/doc/V3vfvGzKswLK/ Corpus classification: court-of-record; evidentiary role: criminal-judgment.
Retrieval
2026-07-29 · Preserved
Bound by Fear research cycle 2026-07-29 (Russian-language sweep; full judgment read via the browser pane; the entry-facilitation finding, the holy-water errand and the movement to the bedroom, all three per-victim losses, the attempted fourth count and the five-year aggregate taken verbatim from the judgment; confirmed no church or clergy implicated; the named presiding judge deliberately not recorded)

Named in this record? Request a correction, report a changed disposition, or submit a response.

Related record

Related cases · Divination and fortune-telling services

Browse all 80 Divination and fortune-telling services records